![]() From Kasparov’s end of the table, the delays made it look as if the machine was struggling, churning through more and more calculations. ![]() ![]() During their infamous six-game match, the machine would occasionally hold off from declaring its move once a calculation had finished, sometimes for several minutes. In order to beat Kasparov, Deep Blue had to understand him not simply as a highly efficient processor of brilliant chess moves, but as a human being.įor a start, the IBM engineers made the brilliant decision to design Deep Blue to appear more uncertain than it was. That symbolic victory, of machine over man, which in many ways marked the start of the algorithmic age, was down to far more than sheer raw computing power. The outcome of the match is well known, but the story behind how Deep Blue secured its win is less widely appreciated. But when IBM’s Deep Blue faced Kasparov in the famous match of May 1997, the machine was immune to such tactics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |